|
Stencil or "foil" thickness is an important part
of stencil design. Optimal paste deposition
onto a PCB is impacted by the relationship that
exists between the pad size, aperture opening
and foil thickness. While the aperture may be
appropriately sized for a pad, a stencil that
is either too thin or too thick may still cause
less than optimal deposition of solder paste.
This relationship is also known as "aspect."
Aspect is the difference in forces that either
pull paste from an aperture and on to a pad
or cause paste to be held within an aperture.
These forces can be quantified and represented
as a measurement called the Aspect Ratio. In
simple terms, for a paste to be adequately deposited
on a pad, the paste surface tension must be
stronger that the surface tension of the paste
to the aperture wall.
A broad set of rules has been adopted that
help us design stencils with appropriate Aspect
Ratios depending on the type of stencil ordered.
It is important that the smallest aperture on
the board be used for this calculation.
For example:
a laser-cut stencil with a 16 mil leaded component
(8 mil aperture width) should have a maximum
foil thickness of 6 mil* [6 x 1.2 = 8]
A stencil should always have a Paste Pulling
Tension of 0.2 or greater:
| Pad Pulling Tension (P) |
|
Aperture (Length (L) ´ Width (W)) |
|
|
= |
|
³
0.6 |
| Retaining Wall tension (R) |
|
Stencil Thickness (T) ´ Aperture Perimeter (2 ´ (L + W)) |
|
Diameter of stencil
openings for different components:
The diameter (GDD) and the height (GDH) of the
glue dots depend on:
- Diameter of the stencil openings
- Stencil thickness
- Viscosity/Rheology of the glue
- Surface roughness of the stencil apertures
- surface tension forces between the glue and
the stencil.
- Surface topography of the PCB
To find an optimal diameter of the glue dot /stencil
apertures for different components, dots with
different diameters were printed onto a glass
substrate then populated with various components.
These combinations of components and glue dots
were then inspected for the maximum dot diameter
that did not contaminate the component metallizations.
In the table below are approximate GDD (and openings
in the stencil) for different components when
printing with a metal, laser-cut stencil of 10
mil thickness using the printing parameters described:
|
Component size
|
Multiple
Dot Approach
*(stencil
opening diameter in mils)
|
Typical
Multiple Dot Pitch
(pitch
in mils)
|
Single
Dot Approach
(stencil
opening diameter in mils)
|
|
0402
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
12 - 16
|
|
0603
|
2 X 20
|
15
|
16 - 20
|
|
0805
|
2 X 24
|
20
|
20 - 24
|
|
1206
|
2 X 32
|
24
|
40 - 47
|
|
Mini Melf
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
40
|
|
SOT 23
|
2 X 28
|
28
|
40
|
|
1812
|
2 X 55
|
40
|
50 - 60
|
|
SO 8
|
3 X 55
|
43
|
N/A
|
|
SO 14
|
3 X 55
|
43
|
N/A
|
|